As far as the twin British marques go, I tend to favor Bentley as opposed to Rolls Royce, even when the two marques looked damn near identical. Plus, saying the word "Bentley" just sounds cool. It's a shame that the brand name has been diluted in recent years and applied to boring, staid-looking vehicles that could easily pass for either bodykitted Chrysler 300s, generic luxury cars from an overseas insurance commercial.
Bentley didn't start out building boring-looking cars (or maybe they did depending on your sector of automotive interest), and I think the past is a great indication of that. While the current crop of Bentley motorcars is far more common (by common, I mean the number of cars produced is more than four digits long), the classic vehicles produced by Bentley were far less so. Case in point; the S2.
After looking at wikipedia and various Bentley fan sites, I can say that the S2 is by far the rarest as a long wheelbase with six made altogether; the more standard version (which I would assume this one is) had a production run of just over 1860 cars; not mega-rare, but not exactly common either, making this one a rather special spotting.
Paint was gleamy but no overly shiny, and I think the two-tone played a big favor in my decision to shoot the car (aside from the obvious traits of left-alone-Britness; I am a sucker for two-tone cars when done right, and I have never seen an old Bentley in two-tone, so this was a pretty good spot for me.
I enjoyed shooting this, and I have never seen it since, so I'm glad I shot it; I would love to find more classic Bentleys, but living in the rustbelt, I doubt that will happen anytime soon (at least till summer rolls around again.)
1 comment:
It's possible the car is registered in Minnesota with the plate number SDF721 (which is what, a 2006 or so MN standard issue combination before they changed over to 123ABC format?) and the owner made a period-looking replica plate. I've seen it done with vanity plates on old British cars here in California.
Post a Comment